Laughing at Bridget Jones and why you might be
laughing at yourself
Barbara Speed | Femusings Magazine - December 29, 2013
This
October, Bridget Jones returns, in all her overweight, clumsy, single,
useless, calorie-counting glory, in Mad About the Boy, the
third in Helen Fielding’s series. Except she doesn’t. Because the
sentence I just wrote encapsulates a misconception about Bridget Jones
that seems to be shared by just about everybody except Helen Fielding
and the (far fewer than you’d guess) people who’ve actually read her
books.
‘Bridget
Jones’ has entered our vocabulary as a byword for single, neurotic
and, yes, fat, modern women. Articles like this
one,
which imply that her very existence is some kind of defiant defence
of being overweight, and the films make us root for a constantly
slipping-up Bridget, rather than the snooty, uptight people around her,
making her endearing yet frumpy, dim yet lovable.
So
it probably sounds far-fetched for me to say that when I first read Bridget
Jones’ Diary, I was extremely jealous of her. Not for her
‘defiant fatness’ as the Daily Mail would probably say, nor for her
sense of humour in the face of a rubbish life. Rather, it was for the
extremely shallow reasons that she is clearly attractive, clever, is
reasonably successful in publishing (a notoriously competitive field),
has a lot of fun with similarly attractive and successful friends, and
is frankly not fat. Not to get too scientific about this, but her
weight in the diaries fluctuates between 125 and 131 pounds, which would
only be overweight if she were under 5 feet tall. At 125 pounds
and 5’9’’, she would actually qualify as underweight. The average
weight of a British woman is 154 pounds.
What
is clear from the diaries is that Fielding is writing, not about a woman
who is deeply flawed and complains about it a lot, but about a woman
who, from the outside, probably looks like she is living the dream –
but on the inside is convinced that there is something perpetually wrong
with her. Noticeably, Bridget lacks any defining characteristics in the
books. We know her daily weight and calorie intake, but not her hair
colour, or even what other physical attributes she detests or likes
about herself. Weight has clearly been chosen by Fielding as an issue
that anyone can relate to: deliberate weight loss is an urge to negate
yourself, or bits of yourself, in order to become somebody different,
somebody better, and is therefore an excellent symbol for all kinds of
insecurity. Equally, when Bridget obsesses over clumsy moments, rather
than making her sound particularly clumsy, she seems to illustrate how
hard we can be on ourselves for relatively minor social gaffes.
Those around Jones in the books don’t seem to buy into her own vision
of herself as either socially awful or enormously fat. In fact, for me
the most awkward social moment in the books comes when Bridget finally
hits her target weight and goes to a party, where an uncomfortable
friend says she looks a bit “deflated.” The friend clearly thought she was fine, as
Mark Darcy famously says, “just as you are.”
The real story arc of the diaries is not the amazement that a man is
able to say this about Bridget, but that she finally believes someone
could.
If you met Bridget at a party, you would meet someone in their
mid-thirties, working in London, single, yes – but who are more fun of
the thirty-somethings you know, those who are single or the ‘smug marrieds’ that Bridget actually
seems bored by rather than jealous of? Someone who is funny,
friendly and (judging by her interest in clothes and makeup)
fashionable. It probably wouldn’t occur to you to feel sorry for her.
Fielding
deserves to be credited with tapping into the real problem of her
generation of women: not weight, or being single, or being clumsy, but
being insecure about anything and everything until there are barely any
similarities between the person you are and the much lesser person you
privately, in diaries, or in your head, believe yourself to be. If most
of the population has been taken in by Bridget’s insecurities, then
the accuracy of Fielding’s representation should be applauded all the
more.
|