Killing
Our Darlings
Mark Medley | National Post - October 25, 2013
His death was announced on a
Sunday in late September; the mourning began almost immediately. On
Twitter, on Facebook, in the comment sections under hastily written
obituaries that appeared in newspapers around the world, his sudden end
was greeted with a mixture of shock and outrage. He was still a
relatively young man. He was so beloved. How could this happen?
The media and the public both clamoured for more details, yet the
circumstances surrounding his death remained under wraps until last
week, when Bridget Jones: Mad About The Boy, arrived in
bookstores.
Mark Darcy dead and Helen Fielding, in the eyes of many, a murderer.
“I turned on the news and there was the Syrian crisis, and then
‘Mark Darcy is dead,’” said Fielding in an interview with The
Associated Press. “It’s quite extraordinary for a fictional
character to be treated as if they’re alive.”
But not uncommon. While Darcy’s peculiar death ranks among the most
unique in recent literary history — spoiler alert, now and
forevermore: he’s blown up by a landmine while travelling in Sudan —
to grieve the demise of a fictional character is a time-tested
tradition. Just think back to the death of (no, really, spoiler alert)
of Albus Dumbledore in 2005’s Harry Potter and the Half-Blood
Prince, probably the most contentious literary death until Darcy’s
armoured SUV exploded. Readers were so devastated by the murder of the
Hogwarts headmaster that an international day of mourning might as well
have been declared. (To be honest, the death of Dobby the House Elf in Harry
Potter and the Deathly Hallows affected me a great deal more; I
think someone was cutting onions nearby when I read that passage.)
When it comes to killing off a character, authors best tread lightly. No
matter that it’s their character, and their book, if a beloved
character meets his or her end before, well, the end, authors should be
prepared for a backlash. An armchair psychologist might argue readers
become upset because the death of a character represents the intrusion
of the real world into the pages — a reminder that, eventually,
everyone dies. No one is immortal. Even fictional characters.
There are few authors who haven’t faced this issue, especially those
who write series featuring the same characters. Familiarity breeds
attachment. Louise Penny, who last month published How The Light
Gets In, the most recent instalment in her series of novels
featuring Chief Inspector Armand Gamache, says authors must strike the
right balance between “what feels right creatively” and “the
long-term viability of the series” or face “the wrath of readers.”
“We spend years hoping readers will see our characters as living,
breathing beings, and not simply words on a page,” says Penny, who was
hesitant to talk in specifics for fear of spoiling her latest book.
“We get people to love the characters, and as soon as they do we kill
one off. As Conan Doyle did with Holmes. As Colin Dexter did with Morse.
As Elizabeth George did with Lynley’s wife. Agatha Christie waited
until after her own death before allowing Poirot’s last case, in which
he dies, to be published. How perfect is that? Creator and created die
at the same moment.”
At the end of his most recent thriller, A Tap on the Window,
Linwood Barclay kills off (final warning) a major character the reader
has grown to love. “There have been a handful of complaints,” he
acknowledges. “I knew this was likely, but I always felt the story
demanded it, and to have taken an easier route would have been wimping
out.”
He admits he sometimes considers “reader reaction” when the fate of
a character hangs in the balance.
“Despite what some may think, I don’t kill off people
indiscriminately,” he says. “I’ve killed off a lot of people in
fiction, and, in most cases, I think it’s been justified.”
Sometimes death is the only option. When a particular storyline has run
its course, or if there is simply nothing left for the character to do,
killing off a character might in fact be the most humane course of
action — a form of literary euthanasia. In By The Time You
Read This, the fourth entry in a series of novels featuring John
Cardinal, Giles Blunt killed off his hero’s wife. “I didn’t have
anything more to say about her, so the question became what’s the most
effective way of dealing with that?” he says. “I’d say reader
response was 98% positive. Of course, killing off someone dear to your
series’ protagonist is vastly different from killing off the
protagonist himself. I’ve killed off the protagonist and other major
characters in several one-off novels. Killing characters is often just
the best thing to do with them — best for the story, anyway.”
It was with an eye toward moving the story forward that propelled Ian
Hamilton to kill off a major character for the first time, an event
which occurs in The Two Sisters of Borneo, to be published in
February, the sixth in a series of novels featuring an ass-kicking
forensic accountant named Ava Lee.
“It was very emotional, to tell you the truth,” he says. “I loved
[the character] as much as anyone did.”
But he never second-guessed his decision. “I thought of three or four
other writers who teased me with things like this and then backed off at
the end,” he says. “Frankly, it really pissed me off. I didn’t
want to do that. There was going to be no miracle cure, there was going
to be no hanging on forever.”
He set the stage for the character’s death in the fifth book, The
Scottish Banker of Surabaya, which came out earlier this year.
Readers, aware that time may be running out, pleaded with Hamilton to
change his mind.
“Since the fifth book came out, I have not done a single event or
reading where someone doesn’t come up to me and say, ‘You can’t
kill [the character],’ he says. “I was at Whistler on the weekend,
and there were some women who’d driven up from Vancouver. They grabbed
me after the panel had finished and that was the message: don’t kill
us off [the character]. I
said it was out of my control.”
Not that it’s necessarily easy for the author, either. Very few
writers are sociopaths. If the readers have bonded with a particular
character, says Penny, the odds are that the writer has developed a
bond, as well.
“I’m my own first customer,” she says. “To kill one of them
would be a form of suicide. It would be devastating. But sometimes
that sacrifice must be made, so that the series can thrive. Take
another, vibrant, direction. And sometimes there’s just no choice. All
paths converge in that one, desperate, place. And have been heading
there all along. The nature of tragedy, no? There was the illusion of
escape — but it was never really going to happen.”
|